Saturday, October 31, 2009
26/11 Hero's Wife Gets RTI Order to Seek Police Record
Mumbai | Oct 24, 2009
The Maharashtra Chief Information Officer (CIO) has asked
city police to allow Vinita, widow of slain police officer Ashok Kamte,
scrutiny of the original transcripts of telephone calls between control
room and police officers on the day of terror attacks last year.
CIO Suresh Joshi has also asked the police to provide copies of
original transcripts of telephone calls and control room log book
and documents to Kamte within 30 days.
The order was passed on Kamte's appeal against the order of a
Deputy Police Commissioner who allowed her scrutiny of
documents but refused to provide copies of the originals.
Kamte and two other police officers, Hemant Karkare and
Vijay Salaskar, were shot dead by terrorists Abu Ismael
and Ajmal Kasab on November 26 last year.
Kamte told PTI, "there were too many discrepancies in reports
on shoot-out in which my husband and two other senior officers
were killed. Unfortunately, police never told us what had happened.
According to a news report, police control room was not aware
that bodies of the slain officers were lying for 40 minutes behind
Cama Hospital after the shoot-out".
"Only when I went to the spot and talked to people
and officers I learnt that there was an exchange of
fire between terrorists and the three officers. Police
clarified this later but it was a half hearted explanation.
Therefore, I was curious to know what had happened
on that night," she said.
Kamte clarified she was seeking details of control room records
only for own satisfaction and that she had not embarked on
a blame game exercise.
Kamte said, initially, she wrote a letter to the city Police
Commissioner seeking details. He forwarded her letter to
Joint Police Commissioner Rakesh Maria but there was no
response. Kamte then filed an application through
Right to Information Act to get details.
The RTI officer rejected Kamte's application.
He attached a letter from Maria, saying the case
was on and the matter was sub-judice, Kamte said,
adding, she filed an appeal before DCP who allowed
her scrutiny of documents but refused to provide the originals.
Kamte said she then filed another appeal which has now
allowed her scrutiny of original documents.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment