Saturday, February 13, 2010

I Am Hurt at Not Being Elevated to SC: Delhi HC CJ

New Delhi | Feb 11, 2010

Delhi High Court Chief Justice Ajit Prakash Shah, 
who scripted landmark judgements like legalising gay
sex and bringing CJI's office within the ambit of RTI Act, 
today said he was "hurt" at being bypassed for elevation to the Supreme Court.

"I cannot pretend that I am not hurt. A sense of hurt is always
there. These things happen in life," Justice Shah lamented during an interaction with reporters on his last working day.

Justice Shah, who has been described as the most deserving judge for the Supreme Court by some of the top jurists, said it is for the people to decide why he was not elevated.

"I think it is for the people to judge why I was denied... 
It really hurts as a human being," Justice Shah said.

The Supreme Court collegium had bypassed Justice Shah,
one of the senior-most High Court Chief Justices, for
elevation while recommending to the Centre names of other judges who were junior to him in October 2008.

The government, however, refused to accept collegium's
decision and returned the file. But it had to finally accept 
the recommendation after the collegium refused to give in.

Justice Shah, who took over as the Chief Justice of the 
Delhi High Court on May 11, 2008, will be retiring on 
Saturday after a tenure of around 21 months.

 Justice Shah, who had given a path-breaking verdict by
legalising gay sex, said he was a bit apprehensive of the 
people's reaction to the verdict.

"On that day, I did not switch on my TV till 8:30 pm
as I was not sure about the kind of reaction the
judgement would provoke," Justice Shah said adding 
even he had earlier thought that gay sex cannot be legalised in the country.

"While attending a workshop in Mumbai, 
I met some gay activists and I had said at that
time that it was difficult for the court in India to 
strike down criminal provision on gay sex. 
But ultimately the case would come to my way and I would decide
the matter," Justice Shah said.

The most controversial judgement pronounced by 
Justice Shah was pertaining to whether CJI's office 
comes within the ambit of RTI Act and he decided 
against the consistent stand taken by Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishanan.

The Judge said the CJI's office comes within the purview of 
transparency law and the higher judiciary should not shy away from public scruitny.

He had also directed the Delhi government to appoint 
special educators for students suffering from various disabilitie
and also ordered three percent reservation for the disabled in jobs in PSUs.

Justice Shah expressed unhappiness over PILs being misused for publicity.

"PILs are vastly misused. The purpose was to protect the
interest of general public and the right of poor (which) 
was neglected...These are all perversions of PILs.
We must address the problems of the weakest section of the society ," he said.

With regard to corruption in the judiciary, Justice Shah said
that there is corruption but it is minimal at higher level.

"I will not tell you the truth if I say no corruption is not there in
the judiciary. It is a reality, corruption does exist, but minimal 
corruption is there in higher judiciary," he said.

Over the media guidelines while covering sensitive cases
in the court, he said the court has nothing to do with this, adding,
"There has to be some self-regulating mechanism for media."

It was an emotional day not only for Justice Shah but also
for the staff and lawyers as they bid adieu to him.

Justice Shah remained busy meeting with the court staff, 
media, the lawyers from High Court bar since he entered the court premises at 10 am.

He brought several reforms in the High Court, including 
setting up the first Arbitration Centre in India and launching two e-courts.

No comments:

Post a Comment